Q & A: Lighting

Posted on: 2 February 2010 | Category: For Photographers, Q & A
7

This post is for all the photographers that have been sending in their questions the past few months. Firstly, super big apologies *with some puppy eyes* from my side. I’ve been wanting to answer them for such a long time, but I have finally managed to sort them out according to the areas of interest and translating all the Afrikaans ones into English :) I’ll now be posting up Q & A posts with one theme running through. This week’s Q & A is all about lighting. Probably one of the most important aspects of photography. No light, no photo…So here are the questions and my answers:

ps. Please remember that these answers are MY opinions, other photographers might have other views on these subjects, but this is how I see it :)

light-1

Ilanie asked: I see you use a flash at the receptions, but how do you get your lighting to look like you do? I also use a flash and I stuck a white piece of cardboard to the top, to bounce when I’m in a thatch roof or dark room space, but it’s not working as I’d like it to work. What would you suggest?

Illanie, firstly I’m not a big fan of flash, because I love soft light. I don’t like shadows or hard light, but in most receptions I have to use one because the ambient light is not enough. The big thing for me, when using your flash, is not to use it directly at the subject and if you do always use some sort of a defuser. I mainly have one 580Ex flash on my canon body and I twist the flash in a 45 degree angle up. This will bounces some light onto my subject, but it will be much softer than direct lighting. I also use a Gary Fong Clear Lightsphere on my flash most of the time, especially in a venue with a very high ceiling or a thatch roof venue. The Gary Fong has a curved dome that acts as a “ceiling” for the light to bounce of. Other items that work for softening the light from the flash is the Sto-fen Omni-Bounce. Both of these items are available at Orms in Cape Town.

Kaycee asked: What do you do in really harsh lighting where the sun is so strong and there isn’t much shaded areas?

This is a hard one! As I said above I’m not a fan of shadows and hard light, so I make a point of it to explain this to my clients when I meet with them before hand. I always try to organize my shoots in the “sunset” time of the day or at least early morning or late afternoon. If I do end up with only harsh light and no shaded area, I will make sure that they are in a full sun lit area, no mottled light. Also make sure your subject is either standing facing the light directly (will be difficult as they will probably squint, but I always ask them just to turn their faces sideways a bit), or with their backs to the sun, shooting directly into it (this will probably result in some lens flair, but can be great :) If you don’t want lens flair, make sure you have someone blocking out the sun for you with) Remember that you will be blowing out a lot of background with this if you only use natural light and expose correctly for the couple. So to even out the light a bit and add a bit more pop to the shot I use my reflector to bounce some sun light back into the shot.

Kaycee asked: How do you get good detail shots if the reception is indoor and there isn’t any natural light? Do you move the centerpieces outdoors to get good lighting?

I shoot all the decor/details of the wedding before I go to the bride. This gives me enough time to get everything in detail. Many times the reception is not very well lit, so I use a tripod. I like to use natural light, over flash, but the shutter will probably have to stay open a bit longer than what I can achieve hand held, so I just put the camera on a tripod. For details this is perfect, everything is standing still, so you just wait for the shot to be properly exposed. I also use a very fast lens (50mm 1.4F and also my 135mm 2F) for my details, so if I bump up the ISO to about 800-1000ISO and have the F. on about 2F I get great hand held shots. Most of the time the candles aren’t lit yet, so I make a point of getting those shots just before all the people enter the reception. I did try a few different things at Helena & Henri’s wedding (check out the cake shot), as it was a super dark venue with hardly any light. I popped a 580Ex (with Gary) on my canon 5D mark2 and then I had a separate flash on a tripod that acted at a slave unit. Both flashed triggered together and it created quite a nice look :)

Pierre de Villiers: Im doing research on flash units and was wondering whether you have any specific ideas that is worth while to mention? I have spoken to a whole bunch of sales people but you know, there is nothing like getting advice from someone who knows, BUT doesn’t want to get money out of you! ;)

As mentioned above I use the Canon 580EX flashes with the The Gary Fong. For off camera flash I use the Pocket wizard units. I’m still not a pro when it comes to off camera and I’m not sure if I really like it, but I’m learning as I go :)

  1. 02/02/2010 , 4:14 pm

    Dankie Christine!

  2. 02/02/2010 , 4:16 pm

    Dis nou dujavu…..ek vanoggend vir jou mailtjie gestuur oor natuurlike lig…….gr8 girl, thanx baie vir die brokkies info…….! Waardeer baie!

  3. 02/02/2010 , 4:41 pm

    Yes!!!!!!!!! Thank you so much for answering my questions! You ROCK!!!!!

  4. 02/02/2010 , 5:48 pm

    Pierre,
    if Christine doesnt mind, I’ll gladly take a stab at your question re flashes…

    if you’re just getting started or on a budget and trying to get into off-camera flash, its worth looking at getting a Sigma. its a cheaper option than the Canons and the Sigma 500/530 DG SUPER range has some nice features and allows you to use them as master/slaves in n multi flash setup. they are not as user friendly tho and you’ll probably end up shooting with them in full manual mode not ETTL. on the up side this is a great way to learn.

    DONT get a sigma “DG ST” flash, they are pretty useless. it must be the SUPER.

    keep in mind that if you do end up getting a canon flash later on, you can still use your sigmas as slaves, in conjunction with the canon… the sigmas have opticle triggers which allows you to trigger them remotely with any other flash (this can also be a huge drawback)

    if you decide to go Canon, the new 580EX that Christine uses is able to act as both a master and slave unit. it’s canons flagship model and comes with all the bells and whistles… and a price tag to match. In “master” mode the 580 lets you control other flashes. you can remotely change the settings on the slaves units from your 580.

    if you have a 7D body you dont even need the master flash, the camera allows you to control the slaves from the camera’s user menu. so with the 7D you just need 1 flash and you will be able to use it off camera. with any other body you will need a 580EX on the camera as a master and then a secondary unit as a slave, off camera.

    for the slave you dont need to fork out for another 580 tho… you can get the cheaper 430EX or even the older 420 or 550. keep in mind that the 430 and 420 can only act as slaves… you cant use them to trigger another flash. I believe the old 550EX flashes are also master units — if you can get your hands on a 2ndhand unit.

    however, if you use a remote triggering device like the industry standard Pocket Wizards, you dont need 2 flashes in order to work with off camera flash. you just need one flash unit and you use the triggers to fire it off-camrea. there are also very cheap alternatives to the pocket wizards — like the Cactus radio triggers. they dont come with all the features or the range of the pocket wizards, but they will let you trigger your flash remotely without too many issues.

    basically, the very least you need to get into off camera flash is a Cactus trigger set and 1 Flash unit. the 430EX or sigma 530DG Super.. or a second hand 420 or 500 DG Super will be the cheapest option. Canon’s 580EX will be the best and most expensive… if you can afford it… get it.

    there is a good review comparing the 580 and 430 here:
    http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Canon-430EX-Speedlite-Flash-Review.aspx

    hope that helps

  5. 03/02/2010 , 12:31 pm

    Christine, Thank You!!! I’ve always preferred using no flash if possible and that is more achievable, ever since getting the 50 f1.4. I recently assisted a Pro at a wedding and even though he is very good, he had his flash going all day, in the church, on the beach, at the reception! I used the 50 f1.4 trying to utilise the natural lighting and even though I still had loads to learn, I liked the results depicting the warmth. I only used my flash at the reception when the sun had set. I didn’t like how my photo’s with the flash came out though, I am using the 580 EXII along with diffuser (I still have loads to learn about flash photography), but I am using the Sto-Fen diffuser. I definitely need to get myself a Gary Fong and hopefully get to achieve better results. I also need to get myself a reflector and know nothing of them, is there a particular one that you would recommend or does it not really matter.

    Thank you for always be an inspiration and so willing to share your craft! You are truly blessed with wonderful talent and it’s amazing that you make the time to pass what you’ve learnt along to others!

  6. 04/02/2010 , 11:07 am

    Jy is AWESOME!!!! Ek het self ‘n 350D canon en neem fotos as ‘n stokperdjie en is absoluut mal oor jou fotos, defenitief ‘n droom doelwit vir my!!!!!

  7. 29/06/2010 , 1:32 pm

    Hi Christine

    Baie dankie vir jou raad vanoggend. Ek waardeer dit. Hier is my info ook sommer nou.